There are physical limitations to hardware that are encountered when large numbers of CPU and memory are required. For the purposes of this chapter, the important limitation is that there is limited communication bandwidth between the CPUs and the memory. One architecture modification that was introduced to address this is Non-Uniform Memory Access (NUMA).
In this configuration, there are multiple nodes. Each of the nodes contains a subset of all CPUs and memory. The access speed to main memory is determined by the location of the memory relative to the CPU. The performance of a workload depends on the application threads accessing data that is local to the CPU the thread is executing on. Automatic NUMA Balancing is a new feature of SLE 12. Automatic NUMA Balancing migrates data on demand to memory nodes that are local to the CPU accessing that data. Depending on the workload, this can dramatically boost performance when using NUMA hardware.
Automatic NUMA balancing happens in three basic steps:
A task scanner periodically scans a portion of a task's address space and marks the memory to force a page fault when the data is next accessed.
The next access to the data will result in a NUMA Hinting Fault. Based on this fault, the data can be migrated to a memory node associated with the task accessing the memory.
To keep a task, the CPU it is using and the memory it is accessing together, the scheduler groups tasks that share data.
The unmapping of data and page fault handling incurs overhead. However, commonly the overhead will be offset by threads accessing data associated with the CPU.
Static configuration has been the recommended way of tuning workloads on
NUMA hardware for some time. To do this, memory policies can be set with
numactl
, taskset
or
cpusets
. NUMA-aware applications can use special APIs.
In cases where the static policies have already been created, automatic
NUMA balancing should be disabled as the data access should already be
local.
numactl
--hardware
will show the
memory configuration of the machine and whether it supports NUMA or not.
This is example output from a 4-node machine.
tux >
numactl --hardware
available: 4 nodes (0-3)
node 0 cpus: 0 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 40 44
node 0 size: 16068 MB
node 0 free: 15909 MB
node 1 cpus: 1 5 9 13 17 21 25 29 33 37 41 45
node 1 size: 16157 MB
node 1 free: 15948 MB
node 2 cpus: 2 6 10 14 18 22 26 30 34 38 42 46
node 2 size: 16157 MB
node 2 free: 15981 MB
node 3 cpus: 3 7 11 15 19 23 27 31 35 39 43 47
node 3 size: 16157 MB
node 3 free: 16028 MB
node distances:
node 0 1 2 3
0: 10 20 20 20
1: 20 10 20 20
2: 20 20 10 20
3: 20 20 20 10
Automatic NUMA balancing can be enabled or disabled for the current
session by writing NUMA
or NO_NUMA
to /sys/kernel/debug/sched_features
which will
enable or disable the feature respectively. To permanently enable or
disable it, use the kernel command line option
numa_balancing=[enabled|disabled]
.
If Automatic NUMA Balancing is enabled, the task scanner behavior can be configured. The task scanner balances the overhead of Automatic NUMA Balancing with the amount of time it takes to identify the best placement of data.
numa_balancing_scan_delay_ms
The amount of CPU time a thread must consume before its data is scanned. This prevents creating overhead because of short-lived processes.
numa_balancing_scan_period_min_ms
and
numa_balancing_scan_period_max_ms
Controls how frequently a task's data is scanned. Depending on the locality of the faults the scan rate will increase or decrease. These settings control the min and max scan rates.
numa_balancing_scan_size_mb
Controls how much address space is scanned when the task scanner is active.
The most important task is to assign metrics to your workload and measure
the performance with Automatic NUMA Balancing enabled and disabled to
measure the impact. Profiling tools can be used to monitor local and
remote memory accesses if the CPU supports such monitoring. Automatic
NUMA Balancing activity can be monitored via the following parameters in
/proc/vmstat
:
numa_pte_updates
The amount of base pages that were marked for NUMA hinting faults.
numa_huge_pte_updates
The amount of transparent huge pages that were marked for NUMA hinting
faults. In combination with numa_pte_updates
the
total address space that was marked can be calculated.
numa_hint_faults
Records how many NUMA hinting faults were trapped.
numa_hint_faults_local
Shows how many of the hinting faults were to local nodes. In
combination with numa_hint_faults
, the percentage
of local versus remote faults can be calculated. A high percentage of
local hinting faults indicates that the workload is closer to being
converged.
numa_pages_migrated
Records how many pages were migrated because they were misplaced. As migration is a copying operation, it contributes the largest part of the overhead created by NUMA balancing.
The following illustrates a simple test case of a 4-node NUMA machine running the SpecJBB 2005 using a single instance of the JVM with no static tuning around memory policies. Note, however, that the impact for each workload will vary and that this example is based on a pre-release version of openSUSE Leap 12.
Balancing disabled Balancing enabled TPut 1 26629.00 ( 0.00%) 26507.00 ( -0.46%) TPut 2 55841.00 ( 0.00%) 53592.00 ( -4.03%) TPut 3 86078.00 ( 0.00%) 86443.00 ( 0.42%) TPut 4 116764.00 ( 0.00%) 113272.00 ( -2.99%) TPut 5 143916.00 ( 0.00%) 141581.00 ( -1.62%) TPut 6 166854.00 ( 0.00%) 166706.00 ( -0.09%) TPut 7 195992.00 ( 0.00%) 192481.00 ( -1.79%) TPut 8 222045.00 ( 0.00%) 227143.00 ( 2.30%) TPut 9 248872.00 ( 0.00%) 250123.00 ( 0.50%) TPut 10 270934.00 ( 0.00%) 279314.00 ( 3.09%) TPut 11 297217.00 ( 0.00%) 301878.00 ( 1.57%) TPut 12 311021.00 ( 0.00%) 326048.00 ( 4.83%) TPut 13 324145.00 ( 0.00%) 346855.00 ( 7.01%) TPut 14 345973.00 ( 0.00%) 378741.00 ( 9.47%) TPut 15 354199.00 ( 0.00%) 394268.00 ( 11.31%) TPut 16 378016.00 ( 0.00%) 426782.00 ( 12.90%) TPut 17 392553.00 ( 0.00%) 437772.00 ( 11.52%) TPut 18 396630.00 ( 0.00%) 456715.00 ( 15.15%) TPut 19 399114.00 ( 0.00%) 484020.00 ( 21.27%) TPut 20 413907.00 ( 0.00%) 493618.00 ( 19.26%) TPut 21 413173.00 ( 0.00%) 510386.00 ( 23.53%) TPut 22 420256.00 ( 0.00%) 521016.00 ( 23.98%) TPut 23 425581.00 ( 0.00%) 536214.00 ( 26.00%) TPut 24 429052.00 ( 0.00%) 532469.00 ( 24.10%) TPut 25 426127.00 ( 0.00%) 526548.00 ( 23.57%) TPut 26 422428.00 ( 0.00%) 531994.00 ( 25.94%) TPut 27 424378.00 ( 0.00%) 488340.00 ( 15.07%) TPut 28 419338.00 ( 0.00%) 543016.00 ( 29.49%) TPut 29 403347.00 ( 0.00%) 529178.00 ( 31.20%) TPut 30 408681.00 ( 0.00%) 510621.00 ( 24.94%) TPut 31 406496.00 ( 0.00%) 499781.00 ( 22.95%) TPut 32 404931.00 ( 0.00%) 502313.00 ( 24.05%) TPut 33 397353.00 ( 0.00%) 522418.00 ( 31.47%) TPut 34 382271.00 ( 0.00%) 491989.00 ( 28.70%) TPut 35 388965.00 ( 0.00%) 493012.00 ( 26.75%) TPut 36 374702.00 ( 0.00%) 502677.00 ( 34.15%) TPut 37 367578.00 ( 0.00%) 500588.00 ( 36.19%) TPut 38 367121.00 ( 0.00%) 496977.00 ( 35.37%) TPut 39 355956.00 ( 0.00%) 489430.00 ( 37.50%) TPut 40 350855.00 ( 0.00%) 487802.00 ( 39.03%) TPut 41 345001.00 ( 0.00%) 468021.00 ( 35.66%) TPut 42 336177.00 ( 0.00%) 462260.00 ( 37.50%) TPut 43 329169.00 ( 0.00%) 467906.00 ( 42.15%) TPut 44 329475.00 ( 0.00%) 470784.00 ( 42.89%) TPut 45 323845.00 ( 0.00%) 450739.00 ( 39.18%) TPut 46 323878.00 ( 0.00%) 435457.00 ( 34.45%) TPut 47 310524.00 ( 0.00%) 403914.00 ( 30.07%) TPut 48 311843.00 ( 0.00%) 459017.00 ( 47.19%) Balancing Disabled Balancing Enabled Expctd Warehouse 48.00 ( 0.00%) 48.00 ( 0.00%) Expctd Peak Bops 310524.00 ( 0.00%) 403914.00 ( 30.07%) Actual Warehouse 25.00 ( 0.00%) 29.00 ( 16.00%) Actual Peak Bops 429052.00 ( 0.00%) 543016.00 ( 26.56%) SpecJBB Bops 6364.00 ( 0.00%) 9368.00 ( 47.20%) SpecJBB Bops/JVM 6364.00 ( 0.00%) 9368.00 ( 47.20%)
Automatic NUMA Balancing takes away some of the pain when tuning workloads for high performance on NUMA machines. Where possible, it is still recommended to statically tune the workload to partition it within each node. However, in all other cases, automatic NUMA balancing should boost performance.